My first and only time ever on a movie set was for the 1988 film Fresh Horses, which starred Molly Ringwald and Andrew McCarthy.
Clearly, Fresh Horses was meant to be
a kind of not-quite-sequel to 1986’s Pretty
in Pink, though it didn’t come anywhere close to matching its predecessor’s
success. Fresh Horses was filmed in and around where I grew up in Cincinnati,
Ohio. I was 14-years-old at the time and had been fairly obsessed with John Hughes’
mid-’80s high school dramatic comedies like Pretty
in Pink and The Breakfast Club.
So I was excited when I read an article in the Cincinnati Enquirer, our hometown daily newspaper, about how Fresh Horses was being filmed in town.
The only specific filming
location that was mentioned in the article, and which sounded like it might be
locatable for a 14-year-old kid, was a house on a rolling hillside in Union, Kentucky, across the
Ohio River from Cincinnati. I’d never been to Union, Kentucky, of course, but I figured
that it couldn’t be a very big place. Determined to find that house where they
were filming, I convinced a friend who was a couple of years older and who had
a car to skip school with me one Friday, so that we could drive down to
Kentucky. He was up for that and excited about it, too. This was in the fall of
1987, mid-November as I recall.
We arrived in Union,
Kentucky, by sometime around noon. It was quaint and rural, basically just one
long country road through bluegrass hills and fields of horses. Within a few minutes,
we spotted the big white house on a hillside, set a little ways off the road.
Lighting equipment was set up in metal clusters on the sprawling lawn in front
of the house, but there was no activity going on at that point; as the
abundance of idle lighting equipment clearly indicated, the day’s filming would
commence after sundown. In the meantime, we drove around for a while, had a
late lunch at a roadside diner, and returned to the house that evening, once it
had gotten dark outside.
Then something happened that
would never happen today in 2017. My friend parked his car in the grass
alongside the winding gravel driveway that led to the house, he grabbed a big quilted
blanket from the trunk of his car, and we sat beneath a huge tree to watch the
movie being filmed from a safe distance. I remember seeing one security officer
stationed on the property, a little further up the driveway. He took notice of
us, but he didn’t say anything to us. Neither did anybody else. Nobody even
approached us at all, perhaps thinking that we had some actual reason for being
there. We sat there for hours, in fact, from about seven o’clock until sometime
well after midnight.
During all of those hours,
we saw only two scenes being filmed, both exterior scenes on the front porch of
the house, and both with Andrew McCarthy. In one scene, he drove a car up to
the house and parked, walked slowly up to the porch, peered inside the front
door, then stepped off the side of the porch to walk around the side of the
house. In the other scene, a fight broke out just inside of the house, between
Andrew McCarthy’s character, named Matt Larkin, and some other random tough
guy. Then the brawl tumbled out the front door onto the porch, with poor Andrew
McCarthy’s character hitting the ground in front of the porch steps. I vividly
remember hearing the punctuated shouts of Patti D’Arbanville’s character, Jean,
who owned that big party house on the hill, trying to break up the fight.
Nevertheless, nothing in my
experiences as a young filmgoer had prepared me for just how boring and
repetitious being on the set of a film would feel. The seeming glamour of
Hollywood and the artful deception of edited cinematic narratives had
brainwashed me into thinking that film sets themselves would be equally
glamorous. The scene of Larkin driving up to the house was filmed at least
twenty times, with the movie crew trying to get the right take, and the fight
scene on the porch was filmed about thirty times, maybe even more. Andrew
McCarthy chain-smoked whenever there was a break between takes. I remember
seeing him many years later, portraying Tom Wingfield in Tennessee Williams’ play The Glass Menagerie at the American Repertory Theater in Cambridge,
and catching a glimpse of him chain-smoking yet again, out in the courtyard
with the crew members during the intermission.
Perhaps because of the
repetition involved in the filming, and the novelty of the whole experience,
visiting that film set is indelibly engraved into my memory. I can replay the
entire sequence of events in my mind anytime, like a little cinematic loop
itself. It was fun, too, seeing how those two scenes had been incorporated into
the film when it was released in theaters towards the end of 1988. Larkin’s
little jump off the side of the porch to walk around to the side of the house,
which ended right there with each take during the filming, is followed in the
movie itself by his intense first kiss with Jewel, Molly Ringwald’s character, right
up against the outside wall of that house. This was probably my first actual
lesson about how storylines in movies aren’t filmed chronologically. I don’t think Molly
Ringwald was even on the set of the film that night.
The screenplay for Fresh Horses was adapted from Larry
Ketron’s stage play of the same title, and he adapted the screenplay himself.
The play starred Suzy Amis as Jewel and Craig Sheffer as Larkin when it
premiered in New York in 1986. It’s the story of a well-to-do college student,
Larkin, who’s interested in engineering and design (constructing rides like
rollercoasters, specifically), and his illicit romantic pursuit of Jewel, a
street-smart country girl from across the river, who may or may not even be of age
to be dating him. All of that comes out slowly during the course of the film,
naturally, and with no little amount of melodramatic tears and formulaic
effect. Fresh Horses is not a great
movie, nor even a particularly good one. But that’s part of the reason why I
wanted to write about it this many years later. How can a movie that’s not
particularly good, and more than a little cheesy at times, still feel like it’s kind of good in
retrospect because of how it attaches itself to one’s own youthful memories?
Larkin’s sidekick in the
film, Tipton, is played by Ben Stiller, who makes a charismatic comedic
impression in one of his earliest film roles; he’s cute and expressive and just
manic enough. Tipton is meant to be Larkin’s reliable buddy and his social
conscience, urging him to be more interested in the attractive college women at
a pool party that they attend at a private home, rather than falling for the
seductive girl from the wrong side of the tracks that Jewel represents. Larkin
is still at that age when his homosocial friendships with other guys carry more
weight than his fledgling relationships with women, including the
self-righteous rich girl to whom he’s engaged to be married. That’s probably
why the film opens with Larkin and Tipton cruising in a speedboat together at nightfall
along the banks of the Ohio River, with a widescreen view of the iconic
Cincinnati Reds baseball stadium and the Riverfront Coliseum all decked out in
lights. Fred Murphy’s cinematography certainly captures Cincinnati’s gorgeous
skyline exactly the way I remember it from childhood, as does David Foster’s
wistful opening keyboard score, which takes me right back to the late 1980’s
like nothing else really could.
Much of the dialogue from Ketron’s
original play translates well to the screen, even powerfully so in intermittent
flashes, especially during scenes in a run-down, abandoned railroad shack,
where Jewel and Larkin work through the mysteries of their attraction to each
other and further seal their bond. Jewel’s given a handful of inventive
monologues that cut deeper in those scenes. Although she’s the character who
never graduated from high school, she’s the covert brain of the film, as well
as its fierce heart, facets of the character that Molly Ringwald more than ably
conveys. As Jewel’s name suggests, she’s the magnetic force at the center of
the story; other characters simply react to her. She maintains the control,
even if she’s still too young and naïve to know what do to with it.
Later in the film, there’s
also a riveting performance by a young, smoldering Viggo Mortensen, who plays
Green, the ne’er-do-well husband whom Jewel manages to keep a secret from
Larkin until later in the movie. Mortensen appears almost silently at a
truck-stop diner mid-way through the film, and his only real speaking scene is for a few
important minutes at the movie’s dramatic climax, when Larkin barges into the
ramshackle home where Green lives with Jewel, in order to confront the two of
them together. The way that Mortensen embodies Green’s cruel sensuality, and
the tantalizingly lazy Southern drawl with which he delivers his hushed dialogue,
should have rightly convinced anyone watching the movie back then that he would
go on to have a major career as a film actor.
The moment that I remember
most often from Fresh Horses is a quiet
scene in which Larkin and Jewel walk together beside the tall, criss-crossing
wooden beams of a rollercoaster at a closed-down amusement park in winter. The
amusement park at that time was called Americana in Middletown, Ohio, a place that was located
not too far from where I grew up in Cincinnati. I always loved amusement parks
as a kid, even in the off-season. Recalling the towering structure of the
rollercoaster and the image of a tiny couple embracing next to it, in clear
contrast to its sheer size and height, I think that the scene works almost as a
kind of metaphor for the immensity of time itself, and our own small space at
the margins in the scope of it.
Just curious if you think the home still exists or if you would be able to find it today? I did a google search but couldnt find anything
ReplyDeleteI have a feeling that Jean’s big white hilltop party house from the movie has been razed by now. I also searched for it online when I was writing this post a few years ago, but I found no exact match for it along Route 42, the main road that runs through Union, Kentucky. If the house still existed on that property today, I think there would be some evidence of it online at this point in time…but perhaps it will surface someday if that property is still standing and remains untouched.
DeleteI see this property on google maps that looks similar to the house in the film. Try searching '10301 US 127 Union, Kentucky'. Do you think that is the one? There have been a number of changes to the house, assuming it is the one.
DeleteHmmm, I only see two buildings on the Google Street view, and they look like businesses to me. The farmhouse had a long old barn beside it, and other smaller tool sheds and farming structures like an old chicken coop, etc. But awesome detective work! 🙂
DeleteP.S. I just tried the aerial view map, and I think I see the property you mean. It does bear a resemblance from aloft; however, the driveway up to the house led *directly* up to the house from the road, and that driveway doesn't (unless the driveway is newer). Also, I have no recollection of the house being so close to a high school football field, and since I was in high school myself at the time, I think I'd have remembered that detail if it was the case. Anyhow, I hope we can all eventually find this place collectively, if it's still around!
DeleteYes, the more I try to “make it fit”, the more tricky it becomes, admittedly. I did notice the H.S. but I just thought it was a newly built school after film came out. In the initial kiss scene, the side of the house doesn’t match up in a number of ways. I kept thinking the new owners did a major renovation but who knows. There is a porch on side of movie house where there isn’t one in house I found. Regardless, thanks for replying and appreciate the input!
Delete10301 US 127 Union, Kentucky definitely is not the house. Kind of a similar look, but no. Windows are all wrong. The 4 windows in the movie are the same size, the 10301 the upper floor windows are thin and the lower much wider. Roof pitch is way different. Also their is a oval window in the attic on the house in the movie.
DeleteFantastic! Thank you for letting us know. I love this discussion, and the fact that anybody cares. I wonder if the two houses were built at around the same time, or even by the same construction company. There are certainly similarities in the two structures’ facades. But the different driveway and approach to the house looked off to me, and the hill, and the apparent lack of the rest of the old farmstead that I still vividly remember now. I appreciate your precise and observant input. So the search continues!
DeleteOne other thing to check..try doing a street view on google maps, from Hwy 42 a short distance north from that main intersection in order to get a good look at the front of the house. The look of the house is very similar to scene when Mc Carthy and Stiller first drive up to it(movie is on YouTube right now btw in order to do a side by side comparison).
ReplyDeleteA-ha! After poking around on the map a bit, I landed on a house that looks similar. The area and property have changed drastically, which a guy from Union had warned me about. I took two screenshots of the house on the Street View map and will compare it with my DVD of the film when I get back home tonight. Thanks for your persistence! Fun times, and fun memories. I’ll post an update when I investigate further.
ReplyDeleteOK, I think that IS the house! Amazing. The chimney on the left is gone now, but the chimney on the right remains intact. The widow’s peak is also an exact match. The house and property are more domesticated now. Back then, they were rustic in a great and authentic way. Thank you so much for helping so expertly to pinpoint this! People who find this post will be pleased I bet. Some folks love seeking out these old movie locations, especially residents nearby.
DeleteOh very cool! I really got into checking the details of the house such as the one remaining chimney. It seems they did a complete redo…siding, different windows, etc. but kept the general shape of the roof and porch. I was trying to compare tree locations but that can be dicey bc people tend to remove, add trees over that amt of time. I have a feeling they enclosed the porch near where McCarthy, Ringwald had their nighttime encounter as well. Well, glad I could contribute in a small way lol.
ReplyDeleteSweet. Sounds like you know a lot about houses and construction. I noticed all of those details, too. That was a solid house. Makes sense that it’s still standing. Kudos on your skills identifying it. Like finding a needle in a needlestack, to paraphrase *Saving Private Ryan*.
ReplyDeleteIt was kinda fun trying to locate it and match it up w movie clips, thanks to your description of you and your friend’s fortunate night out at the house those years ago. I’m always looking for filming locations via google maps. My “nerd” thing lol.
ReplyDeleteI’ve actually taught about that particular interest in one of my courses at my university, a class that’s on contemporary culture as simulation. The movie becomes a map to the world that replaces the actual world. I use *The Goonies* as a prime example since it moves all around Astoria, Oregon and has a huge, dedicated fan base that travels there to find the movie locations. Jean Baudrillard’s philosophical/theoretical text *Simulacra and Simulation* is worth checking out in relation to these ideas if you’re curious.
DeleteThank you! That sounds interesting. I appreciate it!
ReplyDelete